HAN Yang, MIAO Zhuang, SUN Yue, et al. Predictive Study of Breast Cancer Pathological Images Based on DenseNet201[J]. New Generation of Information Technology, 2024, 7(1): 06-11
HAN Yang, MIAO Zhuang, SUN Yue, et al. Predictive Study of Breast Cancer Pathological Images Based on DenseNet201[J]. New Generation of Information Technology, 2024, 7(1): 06-11 DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-6091.2024.01.002.
Predictive Study of Breast Cancer Pathological Images Based on DenseNet201
Through image processing and deep learning technology
DenseNet201 network is used to analyze and classify breast pathological images. The dataset included 162 breast cancer specimens
of which DenseNet121 is used for experimental comparison. Experimental results show that DenseNet201 performed better in breast cancer detection than DenseNet121. Through 20 training epochs
the overall accuracy reaches 82%
the accuracy of category without invasive ductal carcinoma is 90%
the recall rate is 84%
and the
F
1
score is 0.87. With invasive ductal carcinoma category accuracy of 66%
recall rate of 77%
F
1
score of 0.71. Compared to other DenseNet networks
DenseNet201 improves accuracy by about 5%. When processing large-scale breast cancer image data sets
DenseNet201 h
as more powerful feature extraction capabilities and can better adapt to complex data patterns and relationships
thus improving the accuracy and efficiency of breast cancer detection.
关键词
乳腺癌DenseNet病理图像深度学习
Keywords
breast cancerDenseNetpathological imagedeep learning
references
BURSTEIN H J, CURIGLIANO G, THÜRLIMANN B, et al. Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: The St. Gallen international consensus guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021[J]. Annals of Oncology, 2021, 32(10): 1216-1235.
WILKINSON L, GATHANI T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern[J]. The British Journal of Radiology, 2022, 95(1130): 20211033.
KATSURA C, OGUNMWONYI I, KANKAM H K, et al. Breast cancer: Presentation, investigation and management[J]. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2022, 83(2): 1-7.
ELSTON C W, ELLIS I O, PINDER S E. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer[J]. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 1999, 31(3): 209-223.
UDUPA J K, HERMAN G T. Medical image reconstruction, processing, visualization, and analysis: The MIPG perspective. medical image processing group[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2002, 21(4): 281-295.
CSERNI G, AMENDOEIRA I, APOSTOLIKAS N, et al. Pathological work-up of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Review of current data to be considered for the formulation of guidelin-es[J]. European Journal of Cancer, 2003, 39(12): 1654-1667.
ZHANG Y N, XIA K R, LI C Y, et al. Review of breast cancer pathologigcal image processing[J]. BioMed Research International, 2021, 2021: 1994764.
ZHU Y, NEWSAM S. DenseNet for dense flow[EB/OL]. (2017)[2023]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06316v1https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06316v1.
AL-MASNI M A, AL-ANTARI M A, PARK J M, et al. Simultaneous detection and classification of breast masses in digital mammograms via a deep learning YOLO-based CAD system[J]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2018, 157: 85-94.
STOLLMAYER R, BUDAI B K, TÓTH A, et al. Diagnosis of focal liver lesions with deep learning-based multi-channel analysis of hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging[J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021, 27(35): 5978-5988.
PAPANDRIANOS N, PAPAGEORGIOU E, ANAGNOSTIS A, et al. A deep-learning approach for diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer in bones from whole-body scans[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(3): 997.